Legal Disclaimer

  • This blog is made available by the law firm of Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. for educational purposes only. It is intended to provide general information and a general understanding of the law, but not specific legal advice. This blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state. Use of this blog does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. or any of its attorneys. The content of this blog is not an advertisement for legal services, nor is it an invitation to form an attorney-client relationship. Statements made in this blog are the viewpoints of the individual authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Dickinson, Mackaman, Tyler & Hagen, P.C. or any of its clients. Although this blog may address certain tax issues, it is not intended to constitute a reliance opinion as described in IRS Circular 230 and, therefore, cannot be relied upon by itself to avoid any tax penalties.

« November 2007 | Main | January 2008 »

December 2007

Thursday, December 27, 2007

OCC Wins Another Federal Preemption Case

The Second Circuit recently upheld a ruling stating that the OCC is the exclusive enforcer of banking laws for national banks in Clearing House Association, LLC v. Cuomo, 2007 WL 4233358.  In 2005, the Attorney General of New York sought non-public mortgage lending information of several national banks to investigate possible violations of anti-discrimination laws.  The OCC opposed the AG's investigation on the basis that it has sole visitorial powers over national banks.  The lower court ruled in favor of the OCC and was affirmed by the Second Circuit.  The court stated that Congress has expressly limited the role of states in regulating national banks "especially when such conduct involves the exercise of powers granted to the banks by federal statute and regulation . . . ." 

The Second Circuit did overturn one aspect of the decision.  In the lower court the AG unsuccessfully argued that it had the right to access national bank records to enforce the Fair Housing Act.  On appeal, the court determined that this issue was not ripe and remanded the decision with instructions to dismiss.  It is unclear whether this issue will be revisited.   

Post Watters v. Wachovia cases have consistently held in favor of broad federal preemption.  This case does not seem to advance federal preemption any further, it is just another affirmation of preemption's reach.  All in all its just another brick in the post-Watters v. Wachovia wall.  Expect state attorney generals to continue to try to the climb the wall.    

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

S Corporation Shareholders and Health Insurance Premiums

Roth & Company's Tax Update Blog makes an excellent recommendation to S Corporation shareholders -- you need to make sure that your health insurance premiums are included on your 2007 W-2s.

Click here for the full article. 

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Congress Hears Testimony on the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act

The House Financial Service Committee, which is currently considering the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act of 2007 (H.R. 3915), recently heard testimony from the American Bankers Association and America’s Community Bankers on whether to impose the same standards on nonbank lenders that banks face.  According to Bank News, while the ABA’s testimony primarily urged Congress to require nonbank mortgage lenders to be held to the same standards as banks, they also urged Congress to refrain from imposing additional regulatory burdens on banks, such as licensing and registering of bank lenders.

To view the current status of the Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act, click here.

Friday, December 14, 2007

Federal Reserve Releases New Fee Schedules

Effective January 2, 2008, the Federal Reserve will apply new fee schedules for depository institutions’ payment services.  The price level for priced services will generally increase about 3 percent under the new fee schedules.  Check service fees increased approximately 5 percent while electronic payment services decreased about 8 percent.  Fees for Check 21 deposits decreased by about 3 percent while fees for paper check deposits increased by about 12 percent.

Please see http://www.frbservices.org/FeeSchedules/index.html for more information on the updated fee schedules.

Firm Website

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Iowa LLC Blog